Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 107666 (ALL)

RAJAT BANSAL v. State of U.P. & 4 Others

A482/39549/2024 · 2025-07-06

Anish Kumar Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:106542 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD (Sl. No. 218) Court No. - 78 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 39549 of 2024 Applicant :- Rajat Bansal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Jaideep Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J. 1. Heard Sri Jaideep Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rajesh Gupta, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking quashing of the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 9388 of 2021 (Rajat Bansal vs. Chanchal Gupta and 3 Others) under Section 389 IPC, Police Station-Civil Lines, District- Moradabad as well as the order dated 15.10.2024 and summoning order dated 15.10.2024, in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties. 3. Vide order dated 10.4.2025, this Court had directed the parties to appear before the trial court concerned for verification of the compromise. 4. Today, learned counsel for the applicant has filed a supplementary affidavit annexing therewith certified copy of the compromise which has been placed on record before the trial court and the certified copy of the order dated 16.5.2025 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 5, Moradabad verifying the said compromise. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, learned counsel for the applicant seeks quashing of the entire proceedings of the instant case. 5. Learned A.G.A. do not oppose the prayer for quashing of the entire proceedings against the opposite party no. 2 in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties. 6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, this Court has carefully gone through the record of the case. 7. From the perusal of the record, it is apparent that in view of the matrimonial dispute between the son and daughter-in-law of the applicant, the applicant herein has filed the instant complaint case against the opposite party no. 2, 3 , 4 and 5. However, since the parties have amicably settled the dispute and have arrived at a compromise, which has been duly verified by the trial court, the parties have agreed to withdraw all cases pending against each other. In view thereof and in the light of the judgements of the Apex Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and Another, (2012) 10 SCC 303; Prabatbhai Aahir Alias Prabatbhai Bhimsinghbhai Karmur and others vs. State of Gujarat and Another : (2017) 9 SCC 641; Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab : (2014) 6 SCC 466 and B.S.Joshi and Other vs. State of Haryana and Another : (2003)4 SCC 67, the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 9388 of 2021 (Rajat Bansal vs. Chanchal Gupta and 3 Others) under Section 389 IPC, Police Station-Civil Lines, District-Moradabad, are hereby quashed. 8. The application stands allowed. Order Date :- 7.7.2025 Kirti (Anish Kumar Gupta, J.) Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad