SULAKSHNA v. STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING HSVP
COCP/5195/2024 · 2025-04-09
Harkesh Manuja
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 107640 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 107640 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP No.5195 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 132
SULAKSHNA
Vs STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING HSVP
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ
Present: Mr.
Mr. Manish Dadwal, Asstt. A.G., Haryana.
Mr.
Mr. Arnav Goel, Advocate for
Mr. Vivek Saini, Advocate
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral)
1.
Learn communication dated Sonipat to the Administrator, HSVP, Sonipat giving the details of interest payable be deposited with the Municipal Corp respondent Nos.2 and 3 shall be deposited for the petitioner also submits that remaining sum would b within a week.
2.
In view of the counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition.
3.
Dismissed as not pressed.
4.
However, aforesaid undertaking, attached till the compliance is made.
April 09, 2025 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2024 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.5195 of 2024 (O&M)
Date of Decision:
STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING HSVP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Mr. Gaurav Charya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Dadwal, Asstt. A.G., Haryana. Mr. H.S. Gill, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. Mr. Arnav Goel, Advocate for Mr. Vivek Saini, Advocate for respondent No.4. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 communication dated 08.04.2025 issued by the office of Municipal Corporation, Sonipat to the Administrator, HSVP, Sonipat giving the details of to the petitioner. As per which, an amount of Rs.1,09,040.61/ with the Municipal Corporation, Sonipat respondent Nos.2 and 3 on instructions submits that shall be deposited within a period of seven (07) days from today; Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that remaining sum would b In view of the aforesaid undertaking counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule stands discharged. However, in case respondent Nos.2 and 3 aforesaid undertaking, salary of respondent No.3 the compliance is made.
(HARKESH MANUJA)
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable
Yes/No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.5195 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.04.2025 ......Petitioner STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY,
....Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA for the petitioner.
Mr. Manish Dadwal, Asstt. A.G., Haryana. for respondent Nos.2 and 3. for respondent No.4. ed counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 refers to a the office of Municipal Corporation, Sonipat to the Administrator, HSVP, Sonipat giving the details of amount of . As per which, an amount of Rs.1,09,040.61/- is to oration, Sonipat. Learned counsel on instructions submits that a sum of Rs.1,04,869.56/ of seven (07) days from today; Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that remaining sum would be deposited by him aforesaid undertaking by the respondent(s), learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Rule stands discharged. Nos.2 and 3 fails to abide by the of respondent No.3 to the extent of 1/3rd shall remain (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE 1 and 3 refers to a the office of Municipal Corporation, amount of is to for a sum of Rs.1,04,869.56/- of seven (07) days from today; Learned counsel e deposited by him by the respondent(s), learned fails to abide by the remain MOHMED ATIK 2025.04.09 18:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this
order/judgment