JITU SINGH AND 3 OTHERS v. State of U.P. AND 10 OTHERS
WRIC/38234/2024 · 2025-03-06
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 107630 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 107630 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:33779 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38234 of 2024 Petitioner :- Jitu Singh And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anish Kumar Sinha,Arvind Srivastava Iii Counsel for Respondent :- Avinash Chandra Srivastava,C.S.C.,Dinesh Kumar Singh Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :-
"issue a writ, order or direction including a writ in the nature of CERTIORARI calling for the records and quashing the impugned order dated 08.10.2024 (Annexure No. 1) passed by the respondent no. 2 namely Additional Commissioner (Administration) Agra Division, Agra only to the extent the stay application
of
the
petitioners
has
been
rejected. b) issue a writ, order or direction including a writ in the nature of MANDAMUS directing the respondent no. 2 & 3 not to implement the order dated 21.08.2024 passed by the respondent no. 3 during the pendency of the revision 2203 по. of 2024 (C2024011000002203) before the Additional Commissioner, Agra Division, Agra. c) issue a writ, order or direction including a writ in the nature of MANDAMUS directing the respondent no. 1 to 4 not to disturb the possession of the petitioners over Khata no. 76, Khasra No. 166/37/0.567 and 166/39/0.688 hectare situate at Village Begumpur Khadar, Tehsil Math, District Mathura"
3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that against the
order passed under Section 49 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, petitioners have preferred a revision. Revision filed by the petitioners has been admitted but the application for interim relief has been rejected.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that no useful purpose would be served in keeping this writ petition pending and a direction may be issued to respondent No.2 to decide the above-mentioned revision, expeditiously.
5. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the above-mentioned revision, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within four months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and after providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment.
6. Till disposal of the revision, parties are directed to maintain status quo. It is further provided that petitioners will not seek adjournment and in case, they sought an adjournment, the interim order granted by this Court shall automatically vacated.
Order Date :- 7.3.2025 Rishabh [Manish Kumar Nigam, J.] Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad