Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10762 (JHR)

AMAR PRAKASH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3395/2025 · 2025-05-02

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:13332] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3395 of 2025 Amar Prakash, aged about 34 years, son of Sudama Saw, resident of Barhi Gola, P.O. and P.S. -Arohi, District- Rohtas (Bihar). … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sanjay Yadav son of Shri Chando Yadav, resident of Shastrinagar, Jamadoba, P.O. Bhaga, P.S.-Jorapokhar, District- Dhanbad. .... opp. parties Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Pradyot Chatterjee, Adv. For the State : Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, Addl. PP 02 / 02.05.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with C.P. Case No. 1299 of 2022 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 420/406 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner purchased a truck after making an agreement of paying Rs. 3,60,000/- in monthly installment of Rs. 69,850/- to the financer of the original owner to whom, the petitioner agreed to pay Rs. 3,60,000/- but the petitioner failed to comply the condition. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and the financer has taken the truck. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 14 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 10.02.2025 , as mentioned in para 15 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Dhanbad in connection with C.P. Case No. 1299 of 2022 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-