[2025:RJ-JP:19942-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Restoration No. 221/2025 In D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.1106/2023 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Department Of Medical And Health Service, Medical Directorate, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Additional Director (Admn.), Department Of Medical And Health Service, Rajasthan, Medical Directorate, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Sunita Daughter Of Shri Roop Chand, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Hamirpur, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 2. Sunita Daughter Of Shri Narender, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Hamirpur, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 3. Priyanka Daughter Of Shri Bijrendra Singh, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Hamirpur, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 4. Suman Kumari Daughter Of Shri Jayram, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of C-85, Sainik Basti, Churu (Raj.). 5. Suman Kaswan Daughter Of Shri Sahiram, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village Binasar, District Churu (Raj.) 6. Kamala Bugalia Daughter Of Shri Chandra Bhan, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Village Chaknyola (Bugaliyon Ki Dhani), Post And Tehsil Malsisar, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 7. Sarita Kumari Daughter Of Shri Vijai Singh, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Village Chaknyola (Bugaliyon Ki Dhani), Post And Tehsil Malsisar, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 8. Amrita Daughter Of Shri Birbal Poonia, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of House No. 130, Jangalat Basti, Dinava Ladakhani, Village Deenwaladkhani, Tehsil Fatehpur, District Sikar (Raj.) 9. Suman Bhairi Daughter Of Shri Chunni Lal Bhairi, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Village Mailasi, Katrathal, [2025:RJ-JP:19942-DB] (2 of 3) [WRES-221/2025] District Sikar (Raj.) 10. Geeta Kulhari Daughter Of Shri Gopal Kulhari, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Village Tasar Badi, Tatanwa, District Sikar (Raj.) 11. Sunita Daughter Of Shri Moti Lal, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Village Kishanpura, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 12. Anita Bhukar Daughter Of Shri Ram Lal Bhukar, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village Dinarpura, District Sikar (Raj.). 13. Saroj Kumari Daughter Of Shri Ballu Ram Nehra, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Gadlakalan, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 14. Suman Daughter Of Shri Kanhya Lal Swami, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of 65, Jat Basti, Posana, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 15. Sumitra Kumari Daughter Of Shri Pal Chand, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village Ghassu, District Sikar (Raj.) 16. Sarla Kumari Daughter Of Shri Satyaveer Singh, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Village Ghisa Ki Dhani, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 17. Sunita Kumari Daughter Of Shri Satyavir Singh, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Village Bhojnagar, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 18. Subhita Kumari Daughter Of Shri Ramavtar, Resident Of Village Arya Nagar, Post Thicholi, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 19. Roshni Daughter Of Shri Mool Chand, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Shri Krishan Nagar, Post Badau, Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 20. Mamta Kumari Daughter Of Shri Satyaveer Singh, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Ghisha Ki Dhani, Doomara, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 21. Shakuntala Daughter Of Shri Balwant, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Bangothri Khurd, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 22. Suman Kumari Daughter Of Shri Amar Chand, Resident Of Village Bijoli, Tehsil Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 23. Sushila Kumari Daughter Of Shri Ramuram, Resident Of [2025:RJ-JP:19942-DB] (3 of 3) [WRES-221/2025] Village Bijoli, Tehsil Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 24. Poonam Kanwar Daughter Of Shri Rampal Singh, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Village Shyampura, Tehsil And District Mahendragarh (Haryana). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sankalp Vijay & Ms. Tanvisha Pant on behalf of Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT Order 12/05/2025 1. Heard on application (No.355/2025) for condonation of delay in filing the restoration application. 2. Taking into consideration the submission and cause shown in the application, we are inclined to condone the delay in filing the restoration application. 3. Accordingly, the application is allowed. Delay in filing the restoration application is condoned. 4. Heard on prayer for restoration. 5. Upon due consideration and cause shown in the application, we are inclined to allow the prayer for restoration. 6. Accordingly, the restoration application is allowed. D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.1106/2023 is restored to its original number. (MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ RAJAT/ANAND TANWAR/54