SHYAM SUNDER KASHYAP v. ZILA SAHAKARI KENDRIYA BANK MARYADIT
WPS/1508/2025 · 2025-02-28
Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10760 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10760 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:10131
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1508 of 2025 1 - Shyam Sunder Kashyap S/o Late Muritram Kashyap Aged About 41 Years R/o Beside Arihant Kirana Store, Ashanagar, Ward No. 21, Durg, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner versus 1 - Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Durg through its Chief Executive Officer, Office at G.E. Road, In front of District Hospital, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Shri Prabhakar Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent : Shri Manish Upadhyay, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board 28/02/2025
1.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that against the order of termination of his service dated 10.1.2025 (Annexure P6) the petitioner has gone before the Joint Registrar and the Joint Registrar has passed an order of stay dated 27.1.2025 (Annexure P2). However, in spite of that, the respondent/Bank has issued a notice for recovery dated 3.2.2025 (Annexure P1) against the petitioner which is under challenge in this petition. Digitally signed by GOPAL SINGH Date: 2025.03.03 19:04:02 +0530
2
2.
Learned counsel for the respondent/Bank appearing on advance copy submits that since the petitioner has already filed an appeal before the Joint Registrar he has to pursue the remedy under the said appeal.
3. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the material available.
4. Considering the fact that the order of recovery and termination of service has been stayed by the Joint Registrar vide order dated 27.1.2025 (Annexure P2) as such the respondent/Bank is directed not to initiate any proceeding for recovery or execution of the impugned order dated 3.2.2025 (Annexure P1). The petitioner is directed to pursue his remedy before the Joint Registrar and the Joint Registrar is expected to pass appropriate orders in this respect.
5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
JUDGE Gopal Singh