PUNAM GUPTA v. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE HARIDWAR
WPCRL/2020/2021 · 2025-04-08
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10757 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10757 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPCRL No.2020 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
None appears for the petitioners.
2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General along with Mr. J.P. Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. Learned State Counsel, on instructions, made a statement before this Court that after investigation, petitioner nos.1 & 2 (Smt. Punam Gupta & Mohit Gupta, respectively) have been exonerated, while charge-sheet was filed against one Himanshu Gupta.
4. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, nothing remains to be decided by this Court in the present writ petition.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is hereby closed.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.) 08.04.2025 AK