Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:74647 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38024 of 2024 Petitioner :- Smt Chamela Devi Respondent :- State Of Up And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Indra Deo Mishra,Manoj Kumar,Shri Ram (Rawat),Sofia Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pradeep Singh Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the Board of Revenue as party respondent in the writ petition, during the course of the day. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. This writ petition has been filed for the following relief:-
"i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/directing the respondents/authorities to take necessary/suitable action against respondent no 5 and 6 and further direct to restrain respondent no 5 and 6 not to interfere in peaceful possession of the petitioner by constructing any building over the lands of the petitioner namely Gata no 58/2 area 0.0760hectare, Gata no 250M area 0.7590 hectare, 427/2 area 0.1260 hectare, Gata No 102/2 area 0.1260 hectare, Gata no 366/2 area 0.0250 hectare, Gata no 108M area 0.1010 hectare, Gata no 358 area 0.2280 hectare, Gata no 220 area 0.1140 hectare situated at Village Mahuari, Tappa 84, Pargana Kantit Pahari and Tehsil Sadar, District Mirzapur."
4. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that by order dated 25.08.2021, lease granted to the petitioner in the year 1968 has been cancelled. Against the order dated 25.08.2021, the petitioner preferred a revision before the Board of Revenue and the operation of order has been stayed by the Board of Revenue in Revision No. 2413 of 2021 filed by the petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that aforesaid revision is pending and the private respondents are trying to take possession of the land in dispute. 5. Learned Standing Counsel submitted that since the revision is pending, the petitioner may move an appropriate application for
interim relief in the revision itself. 6. In view of the same, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. 7.
However, it is provided that in case, the petitioner moves an appropriate application for interim relief before Board of Revenue for redressal of her grievances within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided by the Board of Revenue within six weeks thereafter, in accordance with law, after providing opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned. 8. With these observations the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 8.5.2025 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad