Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10752 (KAR)

D. DEVARAJ URSU BACKWARD AND ANR v. SIDDARAM ISHWARAPPA PATIL AND ANR

CRL.P/201052/2024 · 2025-06-17

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3158 CRL.P No. 201052 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.201052 OF 2024 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. D. DEVARAJ ARASU BACKWARD CLASSES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., BENGALURU REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MILLERS ROAD, VASANTH NAGAR BENGALURU-560079. 2. DISTRICT MANAGER D. DEVARAJ ARASU BACKWARDS CLASSES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., VIJAYAPURA SITUATED AT KANAKADASA BADAVANE VIJAYAPURA DISTRICT - 586101 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VISHVANATH TIPPAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SIDDARAM ISHWARAPPA PATIL S/O ISHWARAPPA PATIL AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDENT OF HORTI INDI TALUK, VIJAYAPURA DISTRICT-586117. C/O. BALI HOUSE, ANJUMAN COLLEGE BEHIND, TQ & DIST: VIJAYAPUR 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA R/BY ADDL. SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH Digitally signed by RENUKA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3158 CRL.P No. 201052 of 2024 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAJESH DODDAMANI, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI JAMADAR SHAHABUDDIN, HCGP FOR R2) THIS PETITION IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C.(OLD)/ U/SEC 528 OF BNSS, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 08.02.2021 PASSED BY THE LEARNED III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, VIJAYAPURA IN P.C.R NO.812/2018 (ANNEXURE-A) AND CONSEQUENTLY QUASH ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS ARISING OUT OF C.C NO. 466/2021 U/SEC 420(B), 427, 406, 409 R/W 34 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, VIJAYAPURA; SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 12.10.2023 PASSED BY THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE VIJAYAPURA IN CRL REV. PTN 161/2021 (ANNEXURE-B); GRANT COSTS OF THESE PROCEEDINGS AND ISSUE ANY FURTHER/OTHER DIRECTIONS /ORDERS AS THIS HONOURABLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND NECESSARY IN THE NATURE OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA) After addressing the arguments at length, learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo. Memo reads as under: “I the undersigned advocate for petitioner, humbly submits that the petitioners may be - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3158 CRL.P No. 201052 of 2024 permitted to withdraw the above petition. Further, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to grant liberty to file discharge application before the Trial Court. Wherefore, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit petitioner to withdraw the above petition and grant liberty as prayed for, in the interest of justice and equity.” Placing the memo on record, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. In view of disposal of main petition, pending application does not survive for consideration. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SRT List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32 CT: PK