M/S WIPRO ENTERPRISES (P) LTD v. WIPRO KARAMCHARI SANGH UNION / GROUP
CWP/3343/2022 · 2025-08-25
Ajay Mohan Goel
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10752 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10752 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.3343 of 2022
Decided on 25th August 2025 M/s Wipro Enterprises (P) Ltd.
…Petitioner Versus Wipro Karamchari Sangh Union/Group of workers
…Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Senior Advocate,
with Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate.
For the respondent: Mr. Nishant Khidtta, Advocate.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
CMP No.20544 of 2025
The application is disposed of by taking on record report prepared under Section 12(3) of the Labour-cum- Conciliation Officer.
CWP No.3343 of 2022
2.
By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has approached this Court inter alia seeking the following relief:-
“The impugned interim order dated 11.05.2022 so passed may kindly be quashed and set aside.”
2
3.
When this case was taken up today, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of the Court to CMP No.20148 of 2025. Learned Senior Counsel submits that during the pendency of these proceedings, a settlement has been arrived between the parties, copy whereof, is appended with the application as Annexure P-1. He further apprises the Court that in terms of the settlement, report was submitted under Section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 by Labour-cum-Conciliation Officer, Baddi Zone, Baddi, dated 16.07.2025.
4.
Learned Senior Counsel has also drawn the attention of this Court to Para-7 of the report submitted by the Labour-cum-Conciliation Officer, in terms whereof, the parties have agreed that all issues related to the past period stand resolved and demands raised in letter dated 27.05.2025 and 12.06.2025 and other demands raised for discussion during the process of negotiation in the conciliation, which are not specifically dealt with are referred to in this settlement, shall be deemed to have been dropped/not pressed and settled accordingly.
3
5.
Accordingly, learned Senior Counsel submits that the petition be disposed of in the light of said settlement.
6.
In the light of the report dated 16.07.2025 of the Labour-cum-Conciliation Officer, which has been taken on record today in terms whereof, the matter now stands amicably settled between the parties, the petition is disposed of as per the settlement, with the observation that both the parties shall be bound by the terms of the settlement. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge
August 25, 2025 (Vinod)