SMT. KRISHNA KUMARI SARASWAT v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A483/146/2025 · 2025-02-05
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10750 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10750 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:19389 Court No. - 82 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 146 of 2025 Applicant :- Smt. Krishna Kumari Saraswat Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Hitesh Pachori Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
1. This application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Complaint Case No.1068 of 2014 (Smt. Krishna Kumari Saraswat Vs. Amit Saraswat and others) under Section 498-A, 323, 504, 406 IPC and 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station New Agra, District Agra, expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer clause of the application during the course of the day. 4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the opposite party no.2 / the accused is adopting lingering tactics in this case. It is further submitted that discharge application was moved by the accused / opposite party no.2 in this case. The said application is still pending. It is further submitted that the applicant is informant of this case, who is appearing before the court. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the entire record. 6. It reflects from the perusal of the order-sheets that the case is pending at the stage of disposal of discharge application moved by the opposite party no.2 / accused. 7. In these circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to decide the discharge application moved by the accused as per law within two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it and thereafter all endeavours shall be made by it for the expeditious disposal of the case within a period of one year, if there is no legal impediment. 8. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 9.
With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 5.2.2025 ss Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad