Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10749 (MAD)

MRS.J.MALARVIZHI v. MRS.A.GNANASUNDARI

CS/157/1999 · 2025-10-07

R N Manjula

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-10-2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA CS No. 157 of 1999 and A.No.4675 of 2023 1. Mrs.J.Malarvizhi No.242, Arcot Road, Vadapalani, Madras-26 2. Mrs.K.Suguna No.1/368, Plot 11, Kumudam Nagar, Mugalivakkam, Porur, Madras-116. ..Plaintiff(s) Vs 1. Mrs.A.Gnanasundari W/o.Devarajan, 242,Arcot Rd.,Vadapalani, Ch 26. 2. Mrs.R.Uma,w/o.Late D.Raju, 242, Arcot Rd., Vadapalani, Ch 26. 3. Miss.R.Nandini D/o.R.Uma, 4. R.Janakiraman S/O.R.UMA. (Defendants 3 and 4 declared as Major and the 2nd defendants discharged from their guradianship as per order dt. 15.09.2023 in Appl.No.4679 and 4680/2023. Time extended as per order dt. 25.09.2023) 5. M/s.R.Vijayalakshmi, W/o.Late D.Ramu, 242, Arcot Rd., Vadapalani, Ch 26. __________ p. 2 6. Miss.R.Sandhya, D/o.R.Vijayalakshmi 7. Miss.R.Priya, D/O.R.VIJAYALAKSHMI (Defenddants 6 and 7 declared as major and the 5th defendant discharged from their guardianship as per order dt. 15.09.2023 in App.No.4679 and 4680/2023. Time extended as per order dt, 25.09.2023) 8. D.Shankar, S/o.Late Devaraj, 10, Ivb St., Alagiri Nagar, Chennai. ..Defendant(s) PRAYER : Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 of O.S.Rules and Section 26 of C.P.C., to pass a judgment and decree (a) for partition and separate possession of the plaintiffs'1/3 share in the properties mentioned in the schedule hereunder (1/6 share for each of the plaintiffs) (b) to direct the eighth respondent, to give a true and correct account of income from the properties described in the schedule hereunder. For Plaintiff(s): Mr.C.Rajan For Defendant(s): Mr.C.Ramesh for D5 to D8 Mr.K.Bijaisundar for D1 JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the plaintiffs reported no instructions already. Today when the matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal" by printing the name of the plaintiffs, even today there is no representation for the plaintiffs. __________ p. 3 2. Hence, this Civil Suit is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected Application is closed. 07-10-2025 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No gsk To 1. Mrs.A.Gnanasundari W/o.Devarajan, 242,Arcot Rd.,Vadapalani, Ch 26. 2. Mrs.R.Uma,w/o.Late D.Raju, 242, Arcot Rd., Vadapalani, Ch 26. 3. Miss.R.Nandini D/o.R.Uma, 4. R.Janakiraman S/O.R.UMA. 5. M/s.R.Vijayalakshmi, W/o.Late D.Ramu, 242, Arcot Rd., Vadapalani, Ch 26. 6. Miss.R.Sandhya, D/o.R.Vijayalakshmi 7. Miss.R.Priya, D/O.R.VIJAYALAKSHMI 8. D.Shankar, S/o.Late Devaraj, 10, Ivb St., Alagiri Nagar, Chennai. __________ p. 4 DR.R.N.MANJULA, J. GSK CS No. 157 of 1999 and A.No.4675 of 2023 07.10.2025 __________