Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10748 (RAJ)

RAJESH KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

CW/3505/2002 · 2025-04-02

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:14911] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3505/2002 Rajesh Kumar, S/o Maha Singh, aged about 32 years and ten months, R/o village & Post, Deoroad Tehsil Chirawa via Narhar District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through its Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. of Rajasthan, Primary Education, Bikaner. 2. Director, Primary Education, Bikaner. 3. District Education Officer, Zila Parishad, Karouli. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Soni, Adv.with Dr. Nitin Soni, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Saumil Sharma, Adv.for Mr. G.K. Sharma, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 02/04/2025 Learned counsel for the respondents has assured to consider the representation of the petitioner. Taking note of the consensus drawn inter-se the parties, this Court directs the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the competent authority/respondents stating the facts and the judgments relevant as per him for instance, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4628/2001 titled as Banwari Lal Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr., and S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.877/2002 titled as Gajraj Yadav Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., and the respondents/competent authority are directed to adjudicate the said representation within an upper limit of 45 days [2025:RJ-JP:14911] (2 of 2) [CW-3505/2002] from the date of receipt of the said representation, by way of a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law and as per the ratio encapsulated in afore-stated judgments. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with the aforementioned directions. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J chandan/5