Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 107449 (ALL)

SMT. NARAYANI DEVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/38870/2024 · 2025-08-19

Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:142943 Court No. - 89 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 38870 of 2024 Applicant :- Smt. Narayani Devi And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Nishi Sengar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Anjani Kumar Shahwal,G.A. Hon'ble Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicants, is taken on record. 2. The case is taken up on mentioning. 3. Heard Sri Alok Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Anjani Kumar Shahwal, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri Manoj Gautam, learned AGA for the State-opposite party no.1. 4. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred with prayer to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.308 of 2010(State Vs. Narayani Devi and another), arising out of Case Crime No.100 of 2010, under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, IPC, Police Station Sikandrarao, District Hathras, pending in the court of Additional Civil Judge(Junior Division)-I, Hathras, on the basis of compromise. 5. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned. He further submits that certified copy of the proceeding of compromise verification is also on record and annexed as annexure no.S.A.-1 to the supplementary affidavit. Learned counsel for the applicants further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicants and opposite party no.2, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed. 6. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants. 7. In view of the fact that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromised and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is also on record and annexed as annexure no.S.A.-1 to the supplementary affidavit and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicants. 8. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.308 of 2010(State Vs. Narayani Devi and another), arising out of Case Crime No.100 of 2010, under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, IPC, Police Station Sikandrarao, District Hathras, pending in the court of Additional Civil Judge(Junior Division)-I, Hathras, are hereby quashed. 9. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed. Order Date :- 20.8.2025 VKG Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad