VINITA v. UTTARAKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION GURUKUL KANGRI HARIDWAR
WPSB/493/2021 · 2025-03-12
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10744 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10744 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:1729-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
UWPSB/493/2021 UHon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. UHon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Anil Kumar Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jayvardhan Kandpal, Standing Counsel for the State. Mr. Himanshu Aswal, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Navnish Negi, Advocate for the respondent No. 1.
2. Petitioner’s candidature for the post of Registrar was cancelled by Uttarakhand Public Service Commission on the ground that, although petitioner has 15 years administrative experience, however, her experience is not in the required pay- scale.
3. As per the advertisement, 15 years experience should have been in the pay-scale of Rs. 6500- 10500 or above, while admittedly, the post held by petitioner earlier, was carrying a much lower scale than what was required in the advertisement, therefore, this Court does not find any reason to interfere in the matter.
4. The writ petition fails and is dismissed.
5. Interim order dated 30.10.2021 is vacated.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 12.03.2025
Mahinder/