Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 107435 (PNJ)

RAKESH KUMAR v. TARSEM SINGH BHINDER

COCP/4973/2024 · 2025-04-29

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP No.4973 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 163 RAKESH KUMAR Vs TARSEM SINGH BHINDER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Present: Ms. Sunita Nambiar for the petitioner. Ms. Kavita Arora for the respondent. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the the contempt proceedings have been sought, stands complied with by the respondent by way of passing a speaking order Court. 2. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner does instant petition, however, seeks liberty to challenge the said speaking order, in accordance with law. 3. Dismissed as not pressed 4. Rule stands discharged. April 29, 2025 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2024 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.4973 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: RAKESH KUMAR TARSEM SINGH BHINDER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Ms. Sunita Nambiar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Kavita Arora, Advocate for the respondent. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondent the contempt proceedings have been sought, stands complied with by the respondent by way of passing a speaking order in terms of order passed by the Writ In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner does instant petition, however, seeks liberty to challenge the said speaking order, in accordance with law. Dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty Rule stands discharged. (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.4973 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.04.2025 ......Petitioner ....Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA respondent submits that the order qua which the contempt proceedings have been sought, stands complied with by the in terms of order passed by the Writ In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the instant petition, however, seeks liberty to challenge the said speaking order, in with the aforesaid liberty. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 1 submits that the order qua which the contempt proceedings have been sought, stands complied with by the in terms of order passed by the Writ not press the instant petition, however, seeks liberty to challenge the said speaking order, in MOHMED ATIK 2025.04.30 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment