APHC010122672011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION N BETWEEN: 1. T.DURGA RAO,& 2 OTHERS, S/O.MUKKAIAH CONDUCTOR E.NO.700589 R/O.JANGAREDDY GUDEM POST AND MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 2. N.NARENDRA KUMAR, S/O.VENKATESHWAR RAO CONDUCTOR E.NO.700687 R/O.JANGAREDDY GUDEM POST AND MANDAL WEST 3. G.V.KRISHNAIAH, S/O.NARAYANA CONDUCTOR E.NO.700489 R/O.JANGAREDDY GUDEM POST AND MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 1. THE APSRTC REP BY ITS M D 2 OTHERS, MUSHEERABAD,HYDERABAD 2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER APSRTC WE REGION, ELURU, DISTRICT WEST GODAVARI 3. THE DEPOT MANAGER APSRTC JANGAREDDY GUDEM DEPOT, DIST.WEST GODAVARI IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 9995/2011 T.DURGA RAO,& 2 OTHERS, S/O.MUKKAIAH CONDUCTOR E.NO.700589 R/O.JANGAREDDY GUDEM POST AND MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT N.NARENDRA KUMAR, S/O.VENKATESHWAR RAO CONDUCTOR E.NO.700687 R/O.JANGAREDDY GUDEM POST AND MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT G.V.KRISHNAIAH, S/O.NARAYANA CONDUCTOR E.NO.700489 R/O.JANGAREDDY GUDEM POST AND MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...Petitioner AND THE APSRTC REP BY ITS M D 2 OTHERS, MUSHEERABAD,HYDERABAD THE REGIONAL MANAGER APSRTC WEST GODAVARI REGION, ELURU, DISTRICT WEST GODAVARI THE DEPOT MANAGER APSRTC JANGAREDDY GUDEM DEPOT, DIST.WEST GODAVARI ...Respondent IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3330] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO T.DURGA RAO,& 2 OTHERS, S/O.MUKKAIAH CONDUCTOR E.NO.700589 R/O.JANGAREDDY GUDEM N.NARENDRA KUMAR, S/O.VENKATESHWAR RAO CONDUCTOR E.NO.700687 R/O.JANGAREDDY GUDEM G.V.KRISHNAIAH, S/O.NARAYANA CONDUCTOR E.NO.700489 R/O.JANGAREDDY GUDEM POST AND Petitioner(s) THE APSRTC REP BY ITS M D 2 OTHERS, ST GODAVARI THE DEPOT MANAGER APSRTC JANGAREDDY GUDEM Respondent(s): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandmaus by declaring the action of the respondents herein in not regularizing petitioners services from the date of initial appointment as per the recruitment regulations of the corporations as illegal, unjust, contrary to law, arbitrary, and also in violation of Article 14 & 21 of Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents herein to reckon the past service that is from the date of initial appointment to till the date of regularization made in pursuance or Proceedings No.P2/255(31)/2007-RM/WG dated 18.10.2007 for the purpose of regularization and for declaration for probation and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P SRIDHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VINOD KUMAR TARLADA The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Despite the matter is listed under the caption “For Dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It evinces that the petitioners have no interest in prosecuting the case. Therefore, the present Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 18.07.2025 Harin 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO 234 W.P.No. 9995 OF 2011 Date: 18-07-2025 Harin