Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10739 (UTT)

SALMAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/1860/2023 · 2025-04-25

Alok Mahra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:3136 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/1860/2023 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Manvendra Singh, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advocate for the applicant 2. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy Advocate General, assisted by Mr. Devendra Singh, A.G.A. for the State. 3. Leaned counsel for the applicant submits that present bail application has become infructuous. Hence, the same may be dismissed as infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed as infructuous. (Alok Mahra, J.) 25.04.2025 Kaushal