IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.4654 of 2024 Date of decision: 03.01.2025 Rajender Singh. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent-State. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Following order was passed in the matter on 21.11.2024:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the reply, though the respondents have admitted that benefit of additional increment, as prayed for by the petitioner, has been extended to him from the date on which date national award was awarded in his favour, however, the benefit of revised leave encashment has not been given to the petitioner. Learned Deputy Advocate General to have instructions in the matter. List after two weeks.” 2. Pursuant to above order, learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record office instructions dated 30.12.2024 from the Director, Higher Education, H.P., conveying that revised leave enchashment also been paid to 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes -2- the petitioner vide Bill No.100101 dated 16.12.2024. A certificate in this regard, issued by the concerned Principal on 17.12.2024, has also been appended with the office instructions. 3. Taking note of above, this writ petition to stand disposed of as grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, to also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 3rd January, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)