RAVIPATI BABY SAROJINI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/7592/2020 · 2025-02-19
Kiranmayee Mandava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10737 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10737 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010122842020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Ravipati Baby Sarojini and o The State of Andhra Pradesh and Counsel for the Petitioner
1. Mannam Venkata Krishna Rao Counsel for the Respondent
1. GP for Revenue (AP) The Court made the following order:
Challenging the proceedings dated 0303.2020 in respect of the land in Kadiyam Village, Kadiyam Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh
2. Heard Sri Mannam Venkata Krishna Rao petitioners, learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 7592/2020 others ...Petitioners AND f Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Mannam Venkata Krishna Rao Counsel for the Respondents: the following order: proceedings issued vide Reference No./A/976/2020 dated 0303.2020 in respect of the land in Kadiyam Village, Kadiyam Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh, the present writ petition is filed. Mannam Venkata Krishna Rao, learned counsel for the , learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue appearing for IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3458] THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Petitioners Respondents vide Reference No./A/976/2020 dated 0303.2020 in respect of the land in Kadiyam Village, Kadiyam Mandal, s filed. , learned counsel for the , learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue appearing for
3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue has placed on record a copy of the written instructions received from the Tahsildar, dated 18.02.2025. A perusal of the same would reveal that since the petitioners and other landowners did not come forward to give consent for acquisition, an alternative land was identified in the adjacent village viz., Jegurupadu, which is nearer to the subject village. Hence, vide proceedings of the Collector, D.Dis.G4/RJY/KDM/KADIAM/497 /2019, dated 25.02.2021, the withdrawal notification under Section 93 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, was issued. 4. Since the proposal for acquisition of the present lands has been withdrawn, no further directions are required to be issued. 5.
The written instructions of the Tahsildar, dated 18.02.2025 are placed on record. 6. In view of the foregoing, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date: 19.02.2025 BSK
180 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 7592/2020
Date: 19.02.2025 BSK