CRM-M-23016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN (141) DANIAL@DHANIAL STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: Present: MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. 19.11.2025 passed by the Court of Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ferozepur wh State and orders dated 30.01.2026 and 25.03.2026 non-bailable warrants were ordered to be issued against the petitioner. 2. 19.11.2025 he was in the State of Gujarat due to some work and could not come back and appear before the Learned Trial Court due to which his bail was cancelled and bonds were forfeited to the State. He was not aware about the subsequent dates o were ordered to be issued against him. Now fresh warrants have been ordered against him for 11.05.2026. It is argued that his absence was not intentional. He 23016-2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN CHANDIGARH DANIAL@DHANIAL Versus STATE OF PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. J.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG, Punjab **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 19.11.2025 passed by the Court of Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ferozepur whereby his bail was cancelled and bonds were forfeited to the State and orders dated 30.01.2026 and 25.03.2026 bailable warrants were ordered to be issued against the petitioner. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitione 19.11.2025 he was in the State of Gujarat due to some work and could not come back and appear before the Learned Trial Court due to which his bail was cancelled and bonds were forfeited to the State. He was not aware about the subsequent dates of hearing due to which non were ordered to be issued against him. Now fresh warrants have been ordered against him for 11.05.2026. It is argued that his absence was not intentional. He is ready to join proceedings IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-23016-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 27.04.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG, Punjab The petitioner is seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 19.11.2025 passed by the Court of Learned Additional Sessions Judge, ereby his bail was cancelled and bonds were forfeited to the State and orders dated 30.01.2026 and 25.03.2026, respectively, whereby bailable warrants were ordered to be issued against the petitioner. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that on 19.11.2025 he was in the State of Gujarat due to some work and could not come back and appear before the Learned Trial Court due to which his bail was cancelled and bonds were forfeited to the State. He was not aware f hearing due to which non-bailable warrants were ordered to be issued against him. Now fresh warrants have been ordered against him for 11.05.2026. It is argued that his absence was not join proceedings before the Learned Trial Court (O&M) .2026 The petitioner is seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 19.11.2025 passed by the Court of Learned Additional Sessions Judge, ereby his bail was cancelled and bonds were forfeited to the whereby r that on 19.11.2025 he was in the State of Gujarat due to some work and could not come back and appear before the Learned Trial Court due to which his bail was cancelled and bonds were forfeited to the State. He was not aware bailable warrants were ordered to be issued against him. Now fresh warrants have been ordered against him for 11.05.2026. It is argued that his absence was not Trial Court AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.27 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-23016 and to abide by the terms and conditions to be imposed upon him. It is, therefore, argued that the petition deserves to be allowed. 3. 4. asking of the Court and submitted that there is no lacuna in the impugned order and therefore, it does not deserve to be set aside. 5. the parties. 6. his non-appearance, his bail was cancelled. Though this Court finds no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order, however, keeping in view the fact that the petitioner is ready to join the proceedings before the Learned Trial Court and upon him by the Trial Court, the petition is disposed of by giving direction to the petitioner to surrender before the Trial Court days from doing so. On his doin surety bonds to the satisfaction of Learned Trial Court, he shall be admitted to bail by the Trial Court. 7. 27.04.2026 Amit Sharma 23016-2026 (O&M) (2) and to abide by the terms and conditions to be imposed upon him. It is, therefore, argued that the petition deserves to be allowed. Notice of motion. Learned State counsel accepts notice of the petition asking of the Court and submitted that there is no lacuna in the impugned order and therefore, it does not deserve to be set aside. This Court has heard the submissions made by the counsel for The petitioner had absented himself appearance, his bail was cancelled. Though this Court finds no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order, however, keeping in view the fact that the petitioner is ready to join the proceedings before the Learned Court and is ready to abide by the terms and conditions to be imposed upon him by the Trial Court, the petition is disposed of by giving direction to the petitioner to surrender before the Trial Court days from doing so. On his doing so and furnishing fresh personal as well as surety bonds to the satisfaction of Learned Trial Court, he shall be admitted to bail by the Trial Court. A copy of this order be sent to the Learned Trial Court. Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable:- Yes/No and to abide by the terms and conditions to be imposed upon him. It is, therefore, argued that the petition deserves to be allowed. Learned State counsel accepts notice of the petition on the asking of the Court and submitted that there is no lacuna in the impugned order and therefore, it does not deserve to be set aside. This Court has heard the submissions made by the counsel for The petitioner had absented himself on 19.11.2025 and due to appearance, his bail was cancelled. Though this Court finds no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order, however, keeping in view the fact that the petitioner is ready to join the proceedings before the Learned is ready to abide by the terms and conditions to be imposed upon him by the Trial Court, the petition is disposed of by giving direction to the petitioner to surrender before the Trial Court within a period of 15 so and furnishing fresh personal as well as surety bonds to the satisfaction of Learned Trial Court, he shall be admitted A copy of this order be sent to the Learned Trial Court. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE er speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Yes/No and to abide by the terms and conditions to be imposed upon him. It is, on the asking of the Court and submitted that there is no lacuna in the impugned This Court has heard the submissions made by the counsel for .2025 and due to appearance, his bail was cancelled. Though this Court finds no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order, however, keeping in view the fact that the petitioner is ready to join the proceedings before the Learned is ready to abide by the terms and conditions to be imposed upon him by the Trial Court, the petition is disposed of by giving direction within a period of 15 so and furnishing fresh personal as well as surety bonds to the satisfaction of Learned Trial Court, he shall be admitted AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.27 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.