Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1073 (JK)

ABDUL AHAD PARRAY v. MOHAMMAD RAMZAN MIR

TrP (Crl)/9/2025 · 2026-06-29

Mohd Yousuf Wani

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S. No.66 Supplementary list HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR TrP (Crl) 9/2025 CrlM(784/2025) ABDUL AHAD PARRAY …Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs. MOHAMMAD RAMZAN MIR ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Imtiyaz Ahmad Sofi, Adv. CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE MOHD YOUSUF WANI, JUDGE ORDER 29.06.2026 1. There is no representation on the part of petitioner. Same has been the case on last two hearings before the court. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the respondent, Mr. Imtiyaz Ahmad Sofi, Advocate, in the matter. 3. Perused the instant transfer petition, the objections filed in rebuttal by the respondent as also the para wise reply submitted by the learned trial court. 4. It appears from the consecutive absence of the petitioner that he does not seem to be interested in the prosecution of this transfer petition. The petition is accordingly dismissed for non- prosecution. 5. The trial court shall proceed on the pending complaint expeditiously. (MOHD YOUSUF WANI) JUDGE SRINAGAR 29.06.2026 “Hilal Ahmad”