Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1073 (CHH)

MAGMA H.D.I. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. SUNITA

MAC/50/2024 · 2025-05-09

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:21932 NAFR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT Dated - 10 th May, 2025 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 50 of 2024 1 - Magma H.D.I. General Insurance Company Limited Through Its Legal Manager, Present Address- Office No. 501 And 512, 5th Floor, D.B. City Corporate Park, Block No. 9, Rajbandha Maidan, Raipur, Cg … appellant versus 1 - Sunita W/o Late Ramesh Yadav Aged About 33 Years R/o Khaddhowa, Ps And Tahsil- Batauli, District- Surguja, CG 2 - Ku. Aditya D/o Late Ramesh Yadav Aged About 13 Years Minor Through Natural Gurardian Mother Smt. Sunita Bai, W/o Late Ramesh Yadav, R/o Khaddhowa, Ps And Tahsil- Batauli, District- Surguja, CG 3 - Ku. Punam D/o Late Ramesh Yadav Aged About 10 Years Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Sunita Bai, W/o Late Ramesh Yadav R/o Khaddhowa, Ps And Tahsil- Batauli, District- Surguja, CG 4 - Pawan Yadav S/o Late Ramesh Yadav Aged About 6 Years Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Sunita Bai, W/o Late Ramesh Yadav R/o Khaddhowa, Ps And Tahsil- Batauli, District- Surguja, CG 5 - Samharpati W/o Dhanai Ram Aged About 55 Years R/o Khaddhowa, Ps And Tahsil- Batauli, District- Surguja, CG SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.05.15 10:13:34 +0530 2 6 - Dhanai Yadav S/o Late Dukhiya Aged About 57 Years R/o Khaddhowa, Ps And Tahsil- Batauli, District- Surguja, CG 7 - Pramod Kumar Agrawal S/o Ram Kumar Agrawal Aged About 42 Years Occupation- Business- Owner Of Vehicle, R/o Main Road, Batauli, Ps And Tahsil- Batauli, District- Sarguja, CG ... Respondent(s) For appellant : Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate For Respondent(s) : None AWARD (PASSED ON 10.05.2025) 1. The present appeal pertains to the compensation awarded under the Employees Compensation Act and the entire amount of compensation granted in favour of the claimant has also been deposited and now the Insurance Company does not want to prosecute the present appeal further. 2. In view of the submissions made by the appellant, the present appeal is disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (M.P.S. Bhatia) Judge -Lok Adalat Member- Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Bilaspur sagrika