VIJAY SINGH AND 4 OTHERS v. State of UP AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/18388/2024 · 2025-01-24
Neeraj Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 107276 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 107276 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:12680 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18388 of 2024 Petitioner :- Vijay Singh And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akshay Kumar Shukla,Ravindra Pal Singh Kashyap Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
1. Case called out in revise. Learned counsel for the pettioners are not present, whereas, learned Standing Counsel is present.
2. Present petition has been filed with the following prayer:
"(a) Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondents not to recover the amount, deduction on the name of commutation amount after completion of 10 years of his retirement and thereafter the excess amount charges from the petitioners will be return back to the petitioners with interest. (b) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent to grant and pay full pension to the petitioners after completion of 10th years of his superannuation."
3. Learned Standing Counsel informed that present controversy is squarely covered with the judgment of Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.01.2025 passed in Writ-A No. 17819 of 2024 (Ashok Kumar Agarwal and 48 Others v. Union Of India and another); Neutral Citation No.-2025:AHC:6439-DB, following which, this Court has also passed several orders. He further submitted that present petition may also be dismissed in light of judgment of Ashok Kumar Agarwal(Supra).
4. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed in terms of order dated 15.01.2025 passed in Ashok Kumar Agarwal(Supra).
5. No order as to costs. Order Date :- 24.1.2025 ADY Digitally signed by :- AMAR DEEP YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad