Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 107207 (ALL)

SMT. SHABNAM v. State of UP AND ANOTHER

WRIC/38390/2024 · 2025-04-07

Shekhar B Saraf, Vipin Chandra Dixit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:50560-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38390 of 2024 Petitioner :- Smt. Shabnam Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Sandeep Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J. 1. Heard Sri Sandeep Kumar Tripathi, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.2. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on part of the respondent no.2/Executive Engineer, Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Milak, District Rampur in considering the representation of the petitioner dated August 23, 2024. 3. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent no.2/Executive Engineer, Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Milak, District Rampur should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner dated August 23, 2024. 4. Accordingly, the respondent no.2/Executive Engineer, Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Milak, District Rampur is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner dated August 23, 2024 within a period of twelve weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 5. In light of the same, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 8.4.2025 Dev (Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad