Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10718 (RAJ)

VAHID S/O CHANDSINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3524/2025 · 2025-03-12

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:11382] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 3524/2025 Vahid S/o Chandsingh, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Bela, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg. (At Present Accused- Petitioners Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 12/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.434/2023 registered at Police Station Sikri, District Deeg for offences punishable under Sections 143, 323, 341 & 354 of IPC. 2. First bail application of the petitioner bearing S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.12455/2024 was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court with liberty to file fresh bail application after examination of the injured witness- Ali Mohammad. 3. Heard. 4. Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the material available on record. 5. On consideration of submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and on perusal of the statements of injured- Ali Mohammad (PW-2) and the complainant- Jaan Mohammad (PW- 1), it is found that they did not support the prosecution story and have been turned hostile. [2025:RJ-JP:11382] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3524/2025] 6. Taking into consideration the overall facts & circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 10.06.2024, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, this second bail application is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above in connection with the aforesaid FIR shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/-together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar/Satyendra/45