1 2025:CGHC:10690-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 153 of 2025 1 - Kuman Singh Paw S/o Dindayal Paw Aged About 48 Years R/o Gram Panchayat- Katra, Mauhatola, Janpad Panchayat And Tahsil- Marwahi, District- Gourella-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) ... Appellant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Chhattisgarh State Election Commission Through Its Secretary, Chhattisgarh State Election Commission, Nirwachan Bhawan, Sector-19, North Block, Nawa Raipur Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector Gourella-Pendra-Marwahi, District- Gourella-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) 4 - Sub-Divisional Officer Marwahi, District- Gourella-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) 5 - Tahsildar And Returning Officer Marwahi, District- Gourella-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) 6 - Dayaram Paw S/o Chhotelal R/o Gram Panchayat- Katra, Mauhatola, Janpad Panchayat And Tahsil- Marwahi, District- Gourella-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Appellant : Ms. Sakshi Chhabra, Advocate 2 For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Govt. Advocate for the State Mr. R.S. Marhas, Advocate for Res. No. 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board On 05.03.2025 Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 1. The present writ appeal has been filed by the writ appellant/ petitioner with the following prayers: “ It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this appeal; set aside the order dated 13.02.2025 passed by the Hon’ble Single Judge in Writ Petition (C) No. 867/2025 and consequently allow the writ petition of the petitioner in the interest of justice.” 2. Heard, Ms. Sakshi Chhabra, leaned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Govt. Advocate, for the State and Mr. R. S. Marhas, Advocate, learned counsel for the Respondent No. 2. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that at present the present appeal would become infructuous as election has already been held. 4. Learned counsel for the Respondent No. 2 also admits the facts and not opposes. 5. Considering the fact that the election has already been held, the present writ appeal is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Sagrika SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.03.06 10:29:57 +0530