Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 107082 (ALL)

BRIJNANDAN PATHAK v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

CRLA/11286/2024 · 2025-09-14

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 11286 of 2024 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J. Heard learned counsel for the appellant learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. This application has been filed for quashing of the cognizance order dated 19.09.2024 as well as the entire proceedings of S.T. No. 1876 of 2024 arising out of case crime No. 505 of 2023, under Sections 323, 325, 504, 506 IPC and section 3(2)5A SC/ST Act, P.S. Sadar Bazar, District Saharanpur pending in the court of Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Saharanpur. On perusal of the record, the Court finds that the allegations made in the first information report disclose commission of a cognizable offence and those allegations have found support from the material collected during the course of investigation on the basis whereof the police has laid a charge sheet against the appellants.Therefore, prayer for quashing the entire proceedings as well as cognizance order stand refused. At this stage, in case appellant appears before the court below within 30 days from today and applies for bail, the same shall be heard and disposed of in accordance with law. With this direction, this appeal is disposed of. September 15, 2025 RPD Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Babu Lal Ram Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashok Kumar Singh Bais, G.A. (Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.) Brijnandan Pathak .....Appellant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RATAN PRAKASH DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad