Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010077352025 2025:GAU-AS:4603 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/343/2025 MEDINI PEGU S/O SRI KALINATH PEGU, RESIDENT OF UJANI CHERAPAI, PS JENGRAIMUKH, DIST MAJULI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR J PAYENG, MS A PAYENG Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER Date : 10.04.2025 Heard Mr. Ms. A. Payeng, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. B. Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. Page No.# 2/3 2. By filing this interlocutory application, the applicant has prayed for correction of the Order dated 29.01.2025, passed in AB No. 2519/2024 as well as the Order dated 25.02.2025, passed in I.A.(Crl.) No. 128/2025. 3. It is submitted by Ms. Payeng, learned counsel for the applicant, that though the present applicant was granted with the privilege of pre-arrest bail by this Court vide order 29.01.2025, passed in AB No. 2519/2024, but inadvertently, while preferring the said anticipatory bail application, the case number was wrongly mentioned as Jengraimukh P.S. Case No. 1066/2024 instead of Jengraimukh P.S. Case No. 28/2024. Accordingly, one interlocutory application, being I.A.(Crl.) No. 128/2025, was preferred praying for correction of the Order dated 29.01.2025, passed in AB No. 2519/2024, which was allowed by this Court vide Order dated 25.02.2025. But, again inadvertently, while preferring the said I.A.(Crl.) No. 128/2025, the case number was wrongly mentioned as Jengraimukh P.S. Case No. 106/2024 instead of Jengraimukh P.S. Case No. 28/2024 and hence, the present interlocutory application has been preferred praying for correction of the Order dated 29.01.2025, passed in AB No. 2519/2024 and the Order dated 25.02.2025, passed in I.A.(Crl.) No. 128/2025 by reflecting the case number as Jengraimukh P.S. Case No. 28/2024. 4. In view of above of the submission made above and also considering the fact that the mistake being inadvertent in nature, I hereby allow the present interlocutory application. Accordingly, the Order dated 29.01.2025, passed in AB No. 2519/2024, as well as the Order dated 25.02.2025, passed in I.A.(Crl.) No. 128/2025, stands corrected to the extent indicated below: Page No.# 3/3 “2. This application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying for grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused/petitioner, who is apprehending arrest in connection with Jengraimukh P.S. Case No. 28/2024, under Sections 69/85/3(5) of BNS, 2023. 5. This order shall be treated as a part of the Order dated 29.01.2025, passed in AB No. 2519/2024 and the Order dated 25.02.2025, passed in I.A. (Crl.) No. 128/2025. 6. Further it is provided that the interim pre-arrest bail granted to the accused/petitioner vide Order dated 29.01.2025 shall remain extended for another 15 (fifteen) days from today, enabling the petitioner to appear before the learned Court below for filing fresh application for regular bail. 7. In terms of above, this interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant