Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 107 (ORI)

NIRMALA DANI v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/34634/2025 · 2026-03-20

Chittaranjan Dash

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.34634 of 2025 Nirmala Dani …. Petitioner Mr. Niranjan Panda, Advocate -versus- State Of Odisha And Ors. …. Opp. Parties Mr. U.C. Behura, AGA CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH Order No. ORDER 20.03.2026 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Parties. 2. By means of this application, the Petitioners seek the following prayer: “That the petitioner therefore prays that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit this petition , Issue notice to opposite parties. By considering the facts and grounds stated above the opposite parties may direct to correct the Final ROR in Khata Nos. 68,69 and 70 Mouza- NARASINGHGADA , P.S. Sonepur, District- Sonepur to record the name of the petitioner by deleting the name of the Govt. for better interest of justice. And may pass any other order(s) as deemed fit and proper in the interest of Justice” 3. Mr. Panda, learned counsel for the Petitioner, in the course of hearing, drew the attention of this Court to the relevant statutory provisions under which the Petitioner is required to approach the competent authority for redressal of his grievance. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to approach the appropriate authority under the relevant provisions of law for redressal of his grievance. In the event such p. 2 an application is filed, the same shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. (Chittaranjan Dash) Judge Priyanka Designation: Senior Stenographer