170 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYAN SAURABH SHARMA AND OTHERS RAVI BHAGAT IAS AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. R.K. Malik, S Mr. Ankur Sheoran, Advocate and Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab HARKESH MANUJA, Learned State counsel on instructions from Head of the Department submits t under orders passed by the Writ Court which was upheld in an intra appeal; within two months from today. He also submits that wherever an employee was recruited prior to 17.07.2020, he shall be acc in terms of notification dated 05.07.2021 within the afore In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the present petition, however it is made clear that in case the respondents fail to do the needf salary of both the respondents shall remain attached till the compliance is made. Rule discharged. Keeping in view the undertaking extended by the respondents, the payment of cost is deferred and in case the a not complied with, the order dated 06.03.2025 passed by this Court imposing cost(s) of Rs.5,000/ automatically stand revived. 02.04.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYAN AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: SAURABH SHARMA AND OTHERS Versus RAVI BHAGAT IAS AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. R.K. Malik, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankur Sheoran, Advocate and Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel on instructions from Head of the Department submits that the petitioners shall be released their benefits under orders passed by the Writ Court which was upheld in an intra appeal; within two months from today. He also submits that wherever an employee was recruited prior to 17.07.2020, he shall be acc in terms of notification dated 05.07.2021 within the afore In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the present petition, however it is made clear that in case the respondents fail to do the needful in terms of aforesaid undertaking, the salary of both the respondents shall remain attached till the compliance is Rule discharged. Keeping in view the undertaking extended by the respondents, the payment of cost is deferred and in case the a not complied with, the order dated 06.03.2025 passed by this Court imposing cost(s) of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to each of the petitioners shall automatically stand revived. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-4877-2024 Date of Decision: April 02, 2025 ........Petitioners ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA r. Advocate with Mr. Ankur Sheoran, Advocate and Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Learned State counsel on instructions from Head of the hat the petitioners shall be released their benefits under orders passed by the Writ Court which was upheld in an intra-Court appeal; within two months from today. He also submits that wherever an employee was recruited prior to 17.07.2020, he shall be accorded benefits in terms of notification dated 05.07.2021 within the afore-stated period. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the present petition, however it is made clear that in case the ul in terms of aforesaid undertaking, the salary of both the respondents shall remain attached till the compliance is Keeping in view the undertaking extended by the respondents, the payment of cost is deferred and in case the aforesaid undertaking is not complied with, the order dated 06.03.2025 passed by this Court to be paid to each of the petitioners shall (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2024 April 02, 2025 Learned State counsel on instructions from Head of the hat the petitioners shall be released their benefits Court appeal; within two months from today. He also submits that wherever an orded benefits In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the present petition, however it is made clear that in case the ul in terms of aforesaid undertaking, the salary of both the respondents shall remain attached till the compliance is Keeping in view the undertaking extended by the respondents, foresaid undertaking is not complied with, the order dated 06.03.2025 passed by this Court to be paid to each of the petitioners shall TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.04.04 15:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document