IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5986 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2024 Thana- Manikpur P.S District- Arwal ====================================================== 1. Brijmohan Yadav son of Late Rameshwak Yadav Resident of Village- Ahamadpur Harna Mathiya PS -Manikpur District -Arwal 2. Minta Devi Daughter of Brijmohan Yadav Resident of Village- Ahamadpur Harna Mathiya PS -Manikpur District -Arwal 3. Anuj Yadav son of Late Ramdeo Yadav Resident of Village- Ahamadpur Harna Mathiya PS -Manikpur District -Arwal 4. Raviranjan Yadav @ Ravi Ranjan Yadarav son of Brijmohan Yadav Resident of Village- Ahamadpur Harna Mathiya PS -Manikpur District -Arwal 5. Niranjan Yadav son of Brijmohan Yadav Resident of Village- Ahamadpur Harna Mathiya PS -Manikpur District -Arwal 6. Chandan Devi Daughter of Rameshwar Yadav Resident of Village- Ahamadpur Harna Mathiya PS -Manikpur District -Arwal 7. Shakeet Yadav son of Rameshwar Yadav Resident of Village- Ahamadpur Harna Mathiya PS -Manikpur District -Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amrendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Bilash Roy Raman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 27-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354(B), 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution case, on 25.03.2024, buffalo Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5986 of 2025(2) dt.27-02-2025 2/3 of informant strayed into the field of accused persons and damaged the crop, due to which, an altercation took place between the parties. Petitioner no. 4 (Raviranjan Yadav) is alleged to have assaulted with lathi on the head of Satyendra Ram and petitioner no. 7 (Sakeet Yadav) assaulted with lathi to Amaresh, whereas petitioner no. 5 (Niranjan Yadav) tore the blouse of Parmila Devi (informant’s neighbour). 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against petitioner nos. 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 and no specific allegation of overt act is alleged against them. Though, petitioner nos. 4 and 7 are alleged to have assaulted with lathi to Satyendra Ram and Amaresh, but as per injury report, doctor has found simple injury. Rest of the allegation is ornamental. Case and counter case. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5986 of 2025(2) dt.27-02-2025 3/3 satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Arwal in connection with Manikpur P.S. Case No. 41 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T