Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 106967 (PNJ)

PRINCE v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CRM-M/60798/2024 · 2025-05-13

Sukhvinder Kaur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 291/2 CRM-M-60798-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.05.2025. Prince ...Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents. *** CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR ....... Present: Mr. Vipul Babuta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.S. Pandher, AAG, Punjab. *** SUKHVINDER KAUR , J. (Oral) Short reply by way of an affidavit of Harjinder Singh, PPS, Assistant Commissioner of Police (South), Police Commissionerate Ludhiana, in compliance of order dated 14.01.2025 filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 7, is taken on record. In Para No.7 of the aforesaid reply, it has been submitted that in view of the conclusion of the two independent inquiries conducted by the office of the Assistant Inspector General (NRI Wing), Ludhiana and the Assistant Commissioner of Police (South), Ludhiana, the allegations levelled by respondent No.8 were found to be baseless and unsubstantiated. It was further submitted that no inquiry or investigation was being conducted or contemplated against the petitioner or his family members by the concerned police authorities. Both complaints were officially closed on KOMAL 2025.05.13 17:32 I attest to the accuracy of this document CRM-M-60798-2024 (O&M) -2- 26.11.2024 and 18.12.2024 and on the date of filing the present reply, there were no pending proceedings or actions initiated by the police against the petitioner or his family in relation to the subject matter. Keeping in view the above, the present petition has become infructuous. Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 13.05.2025. Komal Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/ No Whether reportable? : Yes/ No KOMAL 2025.05.13 17:32 I attest to the accuracy of this document