Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10696 (ALL)

RANGNATH TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

SPLA/1096/2012 · 2025-09-03

Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 1096 of 2012 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. List revised. 2. None present on behalf of appellant to press this appeal. Learned Standing Counsel appears for the State-respondents. 3. After perusal of record, we find that the reliefs claimed in the present appeal have become infructuous by efflux of time. 4. Accordingly, this special appeal is dismissed as infructuous with liberty to file application for recall of this order within two months in case the matter still survives. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. September 4, 2025 A. Pandey Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Anay Kumar Srivastava, Anil Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Rangnath Tiwari .....Appellant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad