[2025:RJ-JP:10904] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2478/2010 Ram Mohan S/o Shri Prasadi Lal, Village Uoonch, Teh. Nadbai, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan Through Its Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department Gr, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Coordinator Program Or District Collector, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 3. The Additional District Program Coordinator Or Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 4. The Block Coordinator Narega And Sub Division Officer., Nadbai, Distt. Bharatpur. 5. The Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Oonch, Teh. Nadbai, Distt. Bharatpur. 6. The Programme Officer, Panchayat Samiti Nadbai, Distt. Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjay Bharati, Dy. GC JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 10/03/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned order dated 08.12.2009 passed by the respondents by which the contractual services of the petitioner has been discontinued. 2. As per the contents of the writ petition, the petitioner was engaged as Gram Rojgar Sahayak by the Gram Panchayat, [2025:RJ-JP:10904] (2 of 2) [CW-2478/2010] Uoonch, Tehsil Nadbai for the year 2008-09 and 2009-10 for performing various works under NREGA Scheme. The services of the petitioner were discontinued on the ground of his negligence. 3. As per the term and condition Nos.6 & 7 of the contract agreement, the contract can be terminated with notice of one month on either side or if any misconduct is their on the part of the first party, if proven after an enquiry the second party can terminate the services of the first party. 4. Here in the instant case, the aforesaid process was not followed and the order impugned has been passed in violation of Condition Nos. 6 & 7 of the contract agreement. 5. In view of above, the writ petition stands disposed of. The impugned order dated 08.12.2009 stands quashed and set-aside. The matter is remitted to the respondents to pass fresh order after following due process as defined under Condition Nos.6 & 7 of the contract agreement. 6. Needless to observe that the necessary orders would be passed by the respondents within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 7. Since the petitioner has remained unrepresented before this Court, Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the petitioner on his residential address mentioned in the memo of writ petition for his intimation/information. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/80