Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10693 (CHH)

Seema Bai v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCC/204/2024 · 2025-02-10

Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:7208 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 204 of 2024 • Seema Bai W/o Vijay Kashyap Aged About 37 Years R/o Block No. 27, Q. No. 2E, Risali Sector Bhilai, Dist- Drug, (C.G.) Pin 490006 ... Applicant versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Family And Health Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, C.G. 2. The Secretary Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board, Raipur Chhattisgarh 3. The Controller Food And Durg Administration Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur, C.G. 4. The Chairman Chhattisgarh State Commission For Scheduled Caste, Raipur, C.G. 5. Yamini Kohli D/o Shri Harprasad Kohli Aged About 29 Years Flat No. B/ 402, Vijaya Apartment, Ahinsha Khand-2, Indrapura, Dist. Gaziyabad, Uttar Pradesh, Pin 201014 6. Uma Gohiya D/o Shri Goverdhan Singh Gohiya Aged About 28 Years Qr. No.05/ PHE Colony, One Tree Hills, Village And Post Bairagarh, Dist. Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, Pin 462030 7. Kusum Singh D/o Shri Jagdish Singh Aged About 29 Years, House No. 258, Sector-12, Vijay Nagar, Dist. Gaziyabad, Uttar Pradesh, Pin 201009 PRIYANKA VERMA Digitally signed by PRIYANKA VERMA Date: 2025.02.10 14:41:54 +0530 2 8. Kiran Singh D/o Kartik Ram Singh Aged About 35 Years House No. 9/554, Nagar Nigam Colony, Near Maharana Pratap Chowk Bilaspur, (C.G.) 495001 ... Respondents For Applicant : Mr. Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Harshal Chouhan, Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Avinash Singh, Advocate For State : Mr. Dilman Rati Minj, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order On Board 10/02/2025 1. Heard on application for restoration of WPS No.3865/2016 (Seema Bai vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others). 2. Taking into consideration the submission of learned counsel for the applicant and the reasons assigned in the application, I am inclined to allow the instant MCC. 3. Accordingly, the MCC is allowed. WPS No.3865/2016, which was dismissed for want of prosecution on 14.02.2024, is restored to its original number. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Priyanka