SARIK HUSAIN ALIAS SARIK AND ORS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPCRL/942/2025 · 2025-08-29
Ashish Naithani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10692 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10692 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:7673 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPCRL No. 942 of 2025
Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. Mr. S. S. Chauhan, learned D.A.G. assisted by Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioners for quashing the impugned F.I.R. No. 0338 of 2025 dated 01.08.2025, for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 191(1), 191(3), 333, 351(2) & 352 of BNS, Police Station Jaspur, District Udham Singh Nagar and further prayed that to direct the respondent no. 2 not to arrest the petitioners in connection with the abovementioned F.I.R..
4. During the arguments, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the Station House Officer, Police Station Jaspur, District Udham Singh Nagar/respondent no.2 to follow the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, passed in ‘Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and Another’, (2014) 8 SCC 273, before proceed to arrest the petitioners.
5. Learned State counsel has no objection on
2025:UHC:7673 the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
6. Having considered the submissions, this Court reminds the Investigating Officer concerned to adhere strictly to the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar (supra). The Investigating Officer shall abide by the requirements of Section 41 and 41A CrPC before effecting any arrest.
7. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is
disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2 to follow the guidelines formulated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in ‘Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and Another’, (2014) 8 SCC 273.
8. It is directed that in the event of the petitioners’ co-operation in the investigation, the Investigating Officer of the case shall not arrest the petitioners without satisfying himself regarding the necessity of arrest as per the mandate of Section 41 CrPC read with the guidelines in Arnesh Kumar (supra).
9. The petitioners shall extend full co- operation in the investigation and shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called upon.
(Ashish Naithani, J.)
29.08.2025 Akash
AKASH Digitally signed by AKASH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=dae2472c001d56469ea76fc0caa68f48ef73518c148d1405 66ab1e26f9cbe61d, postalCode=263001, st=Uttarakhand, serialNumber=27096a1625377537a487dee49224c891823fc6a033 4628b21e516047ed4f22f7, cn=AKASH Date: 2025.08.30 10:21:23 +05'30'