State rep by its Inspector of Police C-3 v. Mohamed Deen @ Deen Mohamed
SUO MOTU TR/16924/2025 · 2025-09-24
D Bharatha Chakravarthy
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 106912 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 106912 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Suo Motu TR.No. 16924 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24.09.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Suo Motu TR.No.16924 of 2025 (P.R.C.No.98 of 2012 of VIII Metropolitan Magistrate Court, George Town Taluk, Chennai) The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, C-2, Elephant Gate Police Station, Crime Branch, Flower Bazaar ... Petitioner Vs. Mohamed Deen @ Deen Mohamed ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER This Suo Motu Case is dealt with in an extraordinary manner by the Dedicated Bench, pursuant to Suo Motu.W.P.(Crl.) No.618 of 2025. 2.The case was registered in Cr.No.268 of 2003 dated 07.08.2003 for the alleged offence under Section 454(2), 397 r/w 511 of Indian Penal Code,
1860. It is reported that there is no previous or subsequent case as against the accused and the case is presently pending at the stage of warrant. The defacto complainant is not residing at the given address and remains untraceable till Page No.1 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Suo Motu TR.No. 16924 of 2025 date.
3. Considering the factual matrix, context of the case, the antecedents of the accused, the reason for absence from his usual place, and the submission that, despite best efforts, the warrant could not be executed, it is evident that even if the accused is brought to face trial, it would impinge upon his right to a speedy trial. Due to the passage of time, a meaningful trial is unlikely, and no useful purpose would be served.
4. Accordingly, the case in P.R.C.No.98 of 2012 on the file of VIII Metropolitan Magistrate Court, George Town Taluk, Chennai shall stand quashed and this Suo Motu Transfer Case stand disposed of. 24.09.2025 nsl Note to the Trial Court: This order is digitally signed and communicated electronically alone. The Trial Court shall take note of the order and accordingly classify the case pending before them as allowed / dismissed /
disposed of, etc, and while doing so, consider any applications such as disposal of properties, etc., and pass appropriate orders, as may be necessary. Further, the Court below is directed to dispatch the copy of this order to all concerned. Page No.2 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Suo Motu TR.No. 16924 of 2025 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. nsl Suo Motu TR.No.16924 of 2025 24.09.2025 Page No.3 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis