Research › Search › Judgment
Madras High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 106911 (MAD)
M.Bakkiyaraj v. The State Represented by, The Inspector of police,
CRL MP/18138/2025 · 2025-09-26
T V Thamilselvi
Transfer Petitionbody2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 106911 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 106911 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL MP No. 18138 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRL MP No. 18138 of 2025 IN CRL A NO. 1508 OF 2025 M.Bakkiyaraj CSCID P.S. Petitioner(s) Vs The State Represented by, The Inspector of police, 1/A Nethaji 2th Denkanikottai Krishnagiri Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): M/s.B.Mohan For Respondent: Mr.V.Meganathan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL MP No. 18138 of 2025 ORDER This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking suspension of sentence imposed by the learned III Additional District Judge, Erode District, Gobichettipalayam, in S.C.No.16 of 2022 dated 29.08.2025, and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the above appeal.
2. The petitioner, who is an accused in S.C.No.16 of 2022, was convicted and sentenced by the III Additional District Judge, Erode District, Gobichettipalayam, vide judgment dated 29.08.2025, as follows: under section 489(B) of IPC - The accused is convicted and sentenced to undergo Rigorous imprisonment for five years + fine of Rs.2,000/- I/d to undergo three months simple imprisonment. Under section 489 © of IPC – The accused is convicted and sentence to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years + Fine of RS.2,000/- - I/d to undergo three months simple imprisonment . Total fine amount of Rs.4,000/- (Rupees four thousand) is not paid. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL MP No. 18138 of 2025
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) raised strong objections, stating that the petitioner had taken a rented house and printed counterfeit notes. Hence, he strongly objected to the suspension of the sentence.
5. This Court finds no reasons to suspend the sentence, since the Trial Court had examined the evidence in its entirety and found that the petitioner had committed very serious and heinous offence.
6. In the result, this Criminal Miscellaneous petition is dismissed. 26-09-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No rri https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL MP No. 18138 of 2025 To 1.The State Represented by, The Inspector of police, 1/A Nethaji 2th Denkanikottai Krishnagiri. 2.The III Additional District Judge, Erode District, Gobichettipalayam. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL MP No. 18138 of 2025 T.V.THAMILSELVI J. rri CRL MP No. 18138 of 2025 IN CRL A NO. 1508 OF 2025 26-09-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis