Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 106899 (PNJ)

SIMARJIT KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/60490/2024 · 2025-03-24

Amarjot Bhatti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-60490-2024 1 210 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-60490-2024 Date of decision: 24.03.2025 SIMARJIT KAUR AND ANOTHER ....Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present: Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Guramrit Kaur, DAG, Punjab. **** AMARJOT BHATTI , J. Petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.107, dated 27.07.2021, under Sections 306, 34 IPC and Section 304-B IPC added later on registered at Police Station Nathana, District Bathinda (Annexure P-1) as the petitioners have been summoned as additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. vide order dated 07.12.2024 (Annexure P-3). 2. Learned counsel for petitioners pointed that they were granted interim relief by the Coordinate Bench vide order dated 03.12.2024 and thereafter vide order date 04.12.2024 they were directed to surrender before the trial Court/Duty Magistrate within fortnight on or before 19.12.2024 and shall move an appropriate application seeking bail which will be considered and disposed of by the trial Court/Duty Magistrate on the same day, by accepting requisite bail/surety bonds to be furnished by the applicant/petitioners to its satisfaction. In pursuance of this order, MONIKA RANI 2025.03.26 13:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-60490-2024 2 present petitioners have already put appearance before the trial Court. Even, amended charge sheet has been framed and the trial is in progress. It is further pointed out that other co-accused Hakam Singh, Jaswinder Kaur @ Mahindo Kaur and Sukhjit Kaur @ Anto Kaur were granted anticipatory bails vide separate orders dated 27.07.2022 which are Annexures P-4 to Annexure P-6. It is submitted that interim relief already granted in favour of petitioners may kindly be confirmed. 3. Learned counsel representing State confirmed that the petitioners were ordered to be summoned on application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. vide order dated 06.11.2024 (Annexure P-3). It is also confirmed that other co-accused were also granted anticipatory bail. Today, learned counsel representing petitioners placed on record downloaded copy of interlocutory order which confirms that both the petitioners have already appeared before the trial Court as additional accused and amended charge sheet has been framed. 4. In the light of this, anticipatory bail filed by the petitioners is allowed and the interim bail already granted before the trial Court/Duty Magistrate stands confirmed with the same terms and conditions. (AMARJOT BHATTI) JUDGE 24.03.2025 monika 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes /No 2. Whether reportable : Yes /No MONIKA RANI 2025.03.26 13:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document