PRAKASH AUDUMBAR KALASKAR AND ORS v. GHANSHAM VINAYAK SHELKE AND ANR
CA/4186/2019 · 2025-01-08
Shri Sanjay A Deshmukh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10688 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10688 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 917 ca 4186-19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 917 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4186 OF 2019 IN FAST/6476/2019 PRAKASH AUDUMBAR KALASKAR AND ORS VERSUS GHANSHAM VINAYAK SHELKE AND ANR ... Mr. Pavse Ashok S., Advocate for Applicants Mr. Y. B. Kale h/f Mr. Zambare Sudheer Ramdas, Advocate for Respondent No.1
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATED : 08/01/2025.
P. C. : A)
ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4186 OF 2019 :
1. Heard.
2. Perused the application. Learned counsel for the applicant pointed out that applicants are rustic villagers. They are not having knowledge of law. The information regarding passing of
judgment and award was not given immediately to them. Therefore the delay is caused. He submitted that the delay is not deliberately caused.
3. Considering the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned. Application is allowed in terms prayer clause-B. The application is disposed of accordingly. 2025:BHC-AUG:490
2 917 ca 4186-19 B)
ORDER IN FAST NO.6476 OF 2019 :
1. Heard.
2. Issue notice to respondents, returnable on 05/02/2025. The learned Mr. Y. B. Kale h/f Mr. S. R. Zambare waives service for respondent No.1.
( SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. )
VS Maind/-