t7--zLjfZ£' lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA RE Betwee n : CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2625 OF 2025 V Pavan Kumar, S/o V. Ramachandra, Aged about 21 years, Occ Student, R/o Eguvapalya.m Harijanawada, RamasamudramTown MandaI, Annamayya District. Petitioner/Accused No.3 AND The State ofAndhra Pradesh, by the public Prosecutor, High Court ofAP, Amaravathi Respondent/Complainant petition under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023(Section 438 of Cr.P.C), Its filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the criml'naI Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Grant Anticipatory Bail to the PetI-tiOner/Accused No.3 and direct the station House Officer, Ramasamudram poll'ce station, Annamayya Dl-strict to enlarge the bail in the of arresting event the petitioner/Accused No.3 Ion Crime No.05 of 2025 on the file of the Ramasamudram police station, Annamayya District. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P V VENKATA RAVI SANKAR and Dr. P.B Reddy, Advocate for the petl'tioner and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent, the court made the followl'ng ORDER 7 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Criminal Petition No.2625 of 2025 Order: This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioner herein/A3, seeking anticipatory bail, in connection with Crime No.5 of 2025 of Ramasamudram Police Station, Annamayya district. 2. A case has been registered against the petitioner herein and others for i'he offences punishable under sections 115(2), 140(4) and 109(1) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya f Sanhita, 2023 (for short lthe BNS'). 3. Case of the prosecution is that four months Prior tO the date of incident, one Hemanth of Dasarlapalli village eloped with i ) - one Jayasree, who is the younger sister-in-law Of the de faCfO complainant, and married her, for which the de facto complainant and` his relatives strongly objected for their inter- caste love marriage and a quarrel took place between them. while so, on 19.01.2025 at about 01.30 pm, while the de facfo complainant along with his uncle namely Reddeppa was drinking tea at Mr. Chay Tea Shop, situated at Chembakur Road - ELIIIi 2 r/ Ramasamudram town, Al to A4, the relatives of Hemanth and some others, came there on two wheelers and stating that the de facfo complainant had done excess in the issue of Hemanth, Al caught hold of his shirt, by telling to take him and-kill, torn his shirt and beat him with hands on his cheeks. ,.Remaining accused kicked the de facfo complainant and forcibly took him by Al and A3 on the scooty and made him to sit in the middle of them to the soap nut tree situated at Mulbgal road and tied him with rope and beat him with hands and sticks and caused him blunt injuries on his cheeks, back and stomach with l'ntend to kill \l`', ;I...`' him. A2 picked up a knife available with him from his pant Packet by raising Cries tO kill him and attempted to stab him. .I Then the de racfo complainant raised cries and on hearing his cries the neighbours rushed there and on seeing them the accused ran away from the spot. 4. Heard. Perused the record. 5. A perusal of the material on record goes to show that a quarrel ensued between the de facfo complainant and the accused when one Hemanth, the relative of Al to A4, contracted love marriage with Jayasree, who is the younger sister-in-law of the c/e facfo complainant. The cfe racfo complainant objected for se QasJ` + i LL tin++ 3 I+ inter-caste marriage. For the said reason, Al to A4 be'lng the relatives of Hemanth are alleged tO have kidnapped the de faCfo complainant and attempted to kill him. Even going by the FIR, all the accused are alleged tO have beat the de faCfo compla'lnant with hands and sticks w-lth intend to kill h'Im. It is represented that A1, A2 and A4 were granted bail by the tr.lal court. The petitioner herein/A3 is a student Studying B.Com. 6. In view of the aforesaid facts and Circumstances Of the case, this court is incl'lned to grant ant'lcipatory bail to the petitioner herein/A3 on the folloW'lng COndit'IOnS. i) In the event Of arrest Of the Petitioner herein/A3 |ln the aforesaid crime, he shall be enlarged on bail On his eXeCut-lng a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) w'lth two suret'les of the like sum each to the satisfaction of the concerned Arresting Officer. ii) pet-ltioner herein shall make himself available for i. interrogation by a police officer as and when required, and he shall not, directly or indirectly, make any |lnducement, threat or promise to ahy person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclos'lng such facts to the Court or to any pol'lce officer. -3__ . ` "o petjtl'on6~r hereI'n Sha" appear before the station House •=~.,+`. `,i officer concerned once in a week I-.e. On every Sunday between 10.00 AM and 1.00 PM, tl'll filing of the charge sheet. 7. Accordingly, the crI-mI'nal PetI-tjOn l's parfly a"owed. As a sequel thereto, the mI'SCellaneous petjtl'ons, l'f any, pending I-n this crimI-nal Petjtl'on shall stand closed. Sd/-P.U.V. BHASKAR RAG ASS]STAiNT REGISTRAR //TRUE Col SEC"ON OFFICER To, 1. The SHO., Ramasamudram police station, Annamayya District. 2. One CC to SRI. P V VENKATA RAVI SANKAR and Dr. P.B Reddy Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court ofA.P [OPUC] 4. One spare copy psk `.i p----_S I HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED :28/03/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.2625 of 2025 PARTLY ALLOWED I E=RiREL +EiI- . -I. -(I