COCP No.4860 of 202 IN TH 136 DINESH KUMA Vs KAMAL KISHO CORAM: HON' Present: Mr. D Mr. H for th Mr. G Mr. R HARKESH MAN 1. Lear petitioner has bee dated 09.01.2025 2. Lear of salary w.e.f. 01 released in favour 3. In vi counsel for the pe 4. Dism 5. How period, as per the contempt petition liable to pay a su the petitioner tow listing of revival a January 14, 202 Atik Wheth Wheth 2024 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No. Date of De UMAR ISHOR YADAV IAS AND OTHERS ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. Divyansh Shukla, Advocate for Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G., Punj Mr. Ratik Kapur, Advocate for the **** MANUJA, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel representing as been given appointment in terms .2025. Learned State counsel on instruction .e.f. 01.01.2024 and notional benefits favour of the petitioner within four we In view of the aforesaid undertakin the petitioner does not press the presen Dismissed as not pressed. Rule stand However, in case the needful is not er the undertaking, the petitioner wou etition and in that eventuality, the er y a sum of Rs.50,000/- as cost(s) from er towards litigation expenses, imm vival application. (HA , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH P No.4860 of 2024 (O&M) of Decision: 14.01.2025 ......Petitioner HERS ....Respondents ESH MANUJA te for ., Punjab and r the respondents. nting the respondents informs that th terms of Writ Court’s order vide ord ructions further submits that the arrea nefits from the date of joining shall b our weeks from today. ertaking by the respondent(s), learne present petition. stands discharged. is not done within the aforementione er would be at liberty to seek revival o the erring/concerned officer would b s) from his/her own pocket in favour o , immediately i.e. on the first date o (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE 1 that the e order arrears shall be learned ntioned vival of ould be avour of date of MOHMED ATIK 2025.01.16 12:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment