DILLIP KUMAR AGRAWAL @ TAPPU KUMAR AGRAWAL v. STATE OF ODISHA
ABLAPL/610/2025 · 2025-01-20
Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10686 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10686 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page 1 of 3.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.610 of 2025
Dillip Kumar Agrawal @ Tappu Kumar Agrawal ..... Petitioner
Represented By Adv. - Agnihotra Sahu -versus- 1) State Of Odisha ..... Opposite Parties 2) Alka @ Nilam Nanda
Represented By Adv. – U.C.Jena, A.S.C.
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
ORDER 20.01.2025
Order No.
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State. Perused the records. 3. This is an application under Section 482, B.N.S.S. filed by the Petitioner for anticipatory bail, involving offence punishable under Section 4 of D.P. Act read with 109(1), 3(5), 85 of B.N.S. in G.R. Case No.1046 of 2024 of the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Rajgangpur arising out of Rajgangpur P.S. Case No.583 of 2024. 4. It is stated by learned counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner is the husband of the informant. He further contended that
Page 2 of 3. there exists a matrimonial dispute between the husband and wife. He further submitted that earlier both the husband and wife approached the Mediation Centre where as per the settlement both sides withdrew the case has been filed by them. Thereafter, they were staying together. He further contended that while staying together, again a dispute arose between the husband and wife. As a result of which the Petitioner has been implicated in the present case falsely at the instance of the informant-wife. He further submitted that the informant has not sustained any injury at all and that the Petitioner belongs to the locality, therefore, there is no chance of his absconding. 5. Considering the seriousness of the allegation, gravity of the offence and the facts of the case, although I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner, however it is observed that, in the event the Petitioner surrenders and moves for bail before the learned court in seisin over the matter within a period of three weeks from today, he shall be released on bail on such terms and conditions as the learned Magistrate may deem just and proper with further conditions that:- I. shall not harass, threaten or terrorize the informant and her family members in any manner whatsoever; and II. shall cooperate with the investigation and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when her presence is required by the I.O. for the purpose of investigation. Violation of any of the terms and conditions shall entail cancellation of the bail. Page 3 of 3. 6. The ABLAPL is disposed of accordingly. 7. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.
( A.K. Mohapatra)
Judge Anil