Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10684 (KAR)

SANTOSH KATTOLLI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/200776/2025 · 2025-07-10

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3814 CRL.P No. 200776 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 200776 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SANTOSH KATTOLLI S/O SHRIMANTH, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: PHYCIAL TEACHER AT MILLENNIUM SCHOOL SWAMI VIVEKANAND NAGAR, SANTOSH COLONY, ALAND ROAD, KALABURAGI R/O H.NO.11-970/2E/2, ASHOK NAGAR, KALABURAGI - 585103 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANTOSH S. KASAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH UNIVERSITY POLICE STATION, DIST.KALABURAGI, REP BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT KALABURAGI BENCH-585103. 2. SRI SUSHIL KUMAR AGE:47 YEARS, OCC: POLICE INSPECTOR, UNIVERSITY POLICE STATION, KALABURAGI, TQ. AND DIST.KALABURAGI-585106. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VEERANAGOUDA MALIPATIL, HCGP FOR R1 AND R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C.(OLD), U/S 528 OF BNSS (NEW) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL Digitally signed by RENUKA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3814 CRL.P No. 200776 of 2025 PROCEEDINGS IN CC NO. 399 OF 2024 VIDE CRIME NO. 295 OF 2023 OF UNIVERSITY POLICE STATION FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/SEC. 109, 114, 120(B), 420, 36, 37 R/W SEC. 34 OF IPC AGAINST THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.10, WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF III ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT AT KALABURAGI. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA) After addressing arguments for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo. The said memo reads as under: “MEMO That, the counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner intended to withdraw the above criminal petition with liberty to file the discharge application before the trial Court. Hence, this memo for withdrawal.” Placing the memo on record, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SVH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29