297 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-206-2020 Date of decision: 14.07.2025 Jang Singh ...Petitioner Versus Narang Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Pardeep Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Akhil Kamra, AAG, Punjab. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 04.12.2019 (Annexure P- 1) passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Malerkotla, vide which an application of the petitioner/plaintiff dated 29.04.2019 (Annexure P-6) for appointment of Local Commissioner has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 has submitted that an application for appointment of Local Commissioner was filed in the proceedings under Order 21 Rule 32 CPC but the said proceedings have been dismissed in default on 29.09.2022 and as per his knowledge, the same have not been restored till date. 3. No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to rebut the abovesaid aspect. 4. Accordingly, the present revision petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to revive the same in case the proceedings under Order 21 Rule 32 CPC are restored. 14.07.2025 (VIKAS BAHL) Pawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2025.07.15 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document