JAY BABA BAKRESWAR RICE MILL PRIVATE LIMITED v. LUNIA MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED AND 3 ORS
Cont.Cas(C)/215/2025 · 2025-04-22
Devashis Baruah
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10683 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10683 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010076802025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/215/2025 JAY BABA BAKRESWAR RICE MILL PRIVATE LIMITED AN EXISTING COMPANY WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 1413, 14TH FLOOR, DIAMOND HERITAGE, 16, STRAND ROAD, KOLKATA- 700001. VERSUS LUNIA MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED AND 3 ORS AN EXISTING COMPANY WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 156A, MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD, 3RD FLOOR, KOLKATA- 700007 AND ALSO AT BLOCK-II, BAJRANGBALI REAL ESTATE, PAMOHI, RAMCHARANI, KAMRUP- 781034, GUWAHATI 2:MANOJ KUMAR LUNIA DIRECTOR IN LUNIA MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED AN EXISTING COMPANY WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE COMPANIES ACT 2013 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 156A MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD 3RD FLOOR KOLKATA- 700007 AND ALSO AT BLOCK-II BAJRANGBALI REAL ESTATE PAMOHI RAMCHARANI KAMRUP- 781034 GUWAHATI 3:RANJU LUNIA DIRECTOR IN LUNIA MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED AN EXISTING COMPANY WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE COMPANIES ACT 2013 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 156A
Page No.# 2/3 MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD 3RD FLOOR KOLKATA- 700007 AND ALSO AT BLOCK-II BAJRANGBALI REAL ESTATE PAMOHI RAMCHARANI KAMRUP- 781034 GUWAHATI 4:RAM NIWAS KHICHAR MANAGER IN LUNIA MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED AN EXISTING COMPANY WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE COMPANIES ACT 2013 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 156A MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD 3RD FLOOR KOLKATA- 700007 AND ALSO AT BLOCK-II BAJRANGBALI REAL ESTATE PAMOHI RAMCHARANI KAMRUP- 781034 GUWAHAT For the petitioner (s) : Mr. G. N. Sahewalla, Advocate Ms. G. Dugar, Advocate Sr For the respondent (s) : XXXX
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R
23.04.2025
Mr. G. N. Sahewalla, the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be well advised to withdraw the instant petition and re-file the same taking into account that certain orders which have been passed thereby extending the earlier order of stay have not been enclosed.
Page No.# 3/3
2. Taking into account the above, the instant petition stands closed on withdrawal.
3. Liberty however is given to re-file the application after enclosing all the necessary documents.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant