Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10682 (CAL)

RABIYAL MOLLA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/3527/2023 · 2025-08-11

Bivas Pattanayak

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

11.08.2025 D/L 1 Ct.No.42. ab IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 3527 of 2023 Rabiyal Molla Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Arunava Pati, …for the petitioner By order dated 4th August, 2025, learned advocate for the petitioner was directed to file a written instruction and also intimate the learned advocate for the State. In compliance thereof, learned advocate for the petitioner files a written instruction of the petitioner dated 8th August, 2025 and the notice of intimation dated 7th August, 2025 to the learned advocate for the State, which are taken on record. Despite intimation, none appears on behalf of the State-respondents. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file afresh with better particulars. In view of such submission, the writ petition being WPA 3527 of 2023 is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh. 2 All connected applications, if any, stand disposed of. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of all necessary legal formalities. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)