Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:82855 Court No. - 66 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43349 of 2024 Applicant :- Rashid Alias Lallan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhanshu Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J. 1. Heard Sri Sudhanshu Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Dr. S.B. Maurya, learned AGA-I for the State. 2. The instant bail application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 43 of 2024, under Section 111 B.N.S. and Sections 3, 25, 35 of Arms Act, Police Station G.R.P., District Ballia during pendency of the trial. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits, on the basis of false allegation, applicant has been made accused in the present matter along with co-accused Ranjeet Kumar and after considering entire facts of the case, co-accused Ranjeet Kumar has been released on bail by this Court vide order dated 28.02.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 41506 of 2024 and on facts, case of applicant is at par with him. 4. He further submits, even from the record it reflects, applicant has challaned for offence of organized crime but there is no cogent evidence that either he was member of any organized crime syndicate or he acted on behalf of such syndicate and this fact suggests that actually Investigating Officer misused the provisions of organized crime. 5. He further submits, however, apart from the present case applicant is having criminal history of one another case but his criminal history has been explained in the instant bail application. 6. He further submits, in the present matter applicant is in jail since 28.09.2024 i.e. for last more than seven months. 7. Per contra, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the argument on facts advanced by learned counsel for the applicant. 8. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. 9. Considering the argument advanced by learned counsel for the applicant and the fact that similarly placed co-accused Ranjeet Kumar has been released on bail by this Court and criminal history of solitary case of the applicant has been explained in the instant bail application and in the present matter he is in jail since 28.09.2024 i.e. for last more than seven months, in my view, applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 10. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail application is allowed. 11. Let the applicant - Rashid @ Lallan be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity. 12. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution will be at liberty to move an application before this Court for cancellation of the bail of the applicant. 13. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. Order Date :- 17.5.2025 AK Pandey Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad