RAJU ALIAS BHUPENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
BA1/1566/2025 · 2025-09-26
Rakesh Thapliyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10679 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10679 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:8755 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
BA1/1566/2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. Saurabh Pandey and Ms. Sarita Bisht,
learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned AGA for the State.
3. Present applicant “Raju @ Bhupendra Singh, son of Gurdeep Singh” is praying for regular bail in relation to First Information Report dated 29.12.2024 bearing FIR No. 235 of 2024, Police Station – Nanakmatta, District – Udham Singh Nagar wherein one Sukhvinder @ Bittu has been implicated for the offences punishable under Section 109 BNS, 2023 under Section 8 / 21 / 60 of the NDPS Act and under Section 3 /25 of the Arms Act.
4.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that present applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated, which is evident from the fact that applicant is not named in the FIR and furthermore, main accused Sukhvinder @ Bittu from whose possession recovery has been shown has already been enlarged on bail. He further submits that on completion of the investigation, charge sheet has been filed against the applicant for the offence punishable under Section 29 read with Section 8 / 21 of the NDPS Act. He further submits that applicant is languishing in jail since 04.02.2025 and the alleged contraband
“smack”, which is shown to be recovered from the main accused Sukhvinder @ Bittu is much below the commercial quantity. He further submits that since charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant.
5. On the other side, learned State Counsel has not disputed this fact that main accused Sukhvinder @ Bittu from whose possession recovery has been shown has already been enlarged on bail and applicant is accused of Section 29 read with Section 8 / 21 of the NDPS Act and is languishing in jail since 04.02.2025.
6. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant and applicant is languishing in jail since
2025:UHC:8755 04.02.2025 and main accused Sukhvinder @ Bittu has already been enlarged on bail, therefore, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves for bail
7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant “Raju @ Bhupendra Singh, son of Gurdeep Singh” be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 26.09.2025 SKS
2025:UHC:8755